Nikki Benedict, Revenue Integrity Analyst, Experity
Timely filing is a critical concept in medical billing that directly impacts claim reimbursement. Despite its importance, the specific requirements and terminology can vary across payer contracts, making it essential for billing teams to understand both the general rules and the payer-specific nuances.
When reviewing a payer contract, timely filing requirements may be outlined under the following sections:
Providers can find Medicare and Medicaid timely filing requirements by consulting the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and relevant state Medicaid websites. For example, Texas Medicaid requires claims to be filed within 95 days and Florida Medicaid requires claims to be filed within 12 months of the date of service. Medicare is the only constant as they generally allow up to 12 months from date of service or date of primary payment.
For most Urgent Care claims, the timely filing period begins at the time of service. For example, payers like some of UnitedHealthcare’s commercial insurances have a 90-day filing limit, which require providers to submit claims within three months of the patient encounter. The timely filing limit is generally non-negotiable in a payer agreement, so the claim may deny for timely filing even if the claim would otherwise have been reimbursable.
For secondary or tertiary claims, however, the timely filing period often begins on the date of the primary payer’s determination, not the original date of service. This distinction is important in cases where delays occur while waiting for an explanation of benefits (EOBs) or responses from primary insurers, as it can impact filing timelines and prevent denials.
When claims are denied, most payers assign separate deadlines for submitting corrections or appeals. There are some exceptions to this:
If a claim is submitted after the deadline and no exception applies, it is typically written off as appeal rights are lost. However, if the claim is filed on time and subsequently denied, it may still be eligible for appeal and reconsideration by the payer. In most cases, payers do not allow providers to bill patients for claims denied due to timely filing issues, although this can vary depending on the payer’s processing rules and the specific terms outlined in provider contracts.
There are several factors that could hold up filing a claim:
Claims rejected at the clearinghouse level may never reach the payer, yet the timely filing clock continues to run. Monitoring these rejections closely and acting swiftly ensures claims are corrected and resubmitted within the deadline. Additionally, clearinghouses provide the submission documentation often required to prove timely filing during appeals.
To ensure claims are submitted within payer-specific timely filing deadlines, healthcare organizations should follow several best practices:
At Experity, we maintain compliance with timely filing requirements by proactively reviewing contract language and collaborating with clinics to ensure timely documentation and claim submission.
Understanding the nuances of payers’ timely filing deadlines, exceptions, and appeal rights are essential for optimizing revenue. While missed deadlines can lead to lost reimbursement, many denials that appear final can be overturned with a strong, well-documented appeal. By identifying common barriers and collaborating with an experienced revenue cycle management organization, providers can mitigate financial risk and improve reimbursement efficiency.
Join over 20,000 healthcare professionals who receive our monthly newsletter.